Cricket and Insect Protein: Are Alternative Proteins Worth Trying?
A Protein Source With Ancient Credentials
The consumption of insects — entomophagy — has been practiced across cultures for thousands of years. Today, over 2,000 species of insects are consumed by humans in approximately 80 countries. Crickets, mealworms, grasshoppers, black soldier fly larvae, and several beetle species are among the most commonly eaten.
In Western markets, insect protein is a newer entrant, appearing primarily as cricket flour in protein powders, protein bars, pasta, and crackers. Understanding the nutritional profile and the sustainability case helps clarify whether this food category deserves more serious attention.
Nutritional Profile of Cricket Protein
Crickets (Acheta domesticus) are among the most researched edible insects for human consumption. Ground into flour, their nutritional profile is competitive with conventional animal protein sources:
Protein content: Cricket flour contains approximately 60-70 percent protein by dry weight — comparable to whey protein concentrate. The protein is complete, containing all essential amino acids.
Amino acid quality: Cricket protein has a favorable essential amino acid profile. Lysine, often the limiting amino acid in plant proteins, is present in ample amounts. PDCAAS scores for cricket protein range from 0.8 to 1.0 in research, placing it in the range of high-quality conventional proteins.
Fat content: Approximately 15-25 percent fat in whole cricket flour, with a favorable omega-6 to omega-3 ratio. The fat content is lower in defatted cricket protein powder.
Micronutrients: Crickets are notably high in iron (comparable to beef on a weight-for-weight basis), zinc, magnesium, potassium, and B vitamins including B12. Calcium content is significant when the whole insect including exoskeleton is consumed.
Chitin: The exoskeleton of insects contains chitin, a polysaccharide fiber-like compound. Chitin has demonstrated prebiotic properties in animal studies, potentially feeding beneficial gut bacteria. Its effects in humans are still being studied.
Digestibility Considerations
Raw or minimally processed insect protein has moderate digestibility in some studies, partly because chitin may bind to nutrients. Heat processing (drying, roasting, autoclaving) improves digestibility by denaturing proteins and partially breaking down chitin. Processed cricket flour has digestibility in the range of 80-85 percent, somewhat lower than the 90+ percent of whey but comparable to many plant protein sources.
Defatted insect protein isolates with chitin removed show higher digestibility and are increasingly available in commercial protein products.
The Allergy Caveat
This is an important safety consideration: people with shellfish allergies may cross-react to insect proteins. Both insects and crustaceans are arthropods, and they share several allergenic proteins including tropomyosin. The FDA requires disclosure of crustacean shellfish allergens on food labels, but insect-derived ingredients currently fall outside mandatory allergen labeling in the US. People with shellfish allergies should exercise caution with insect protein products.
The Sustainability Argument
The case for insect protein is particularly compelling on environmental grounds:
Land use: Producing 1 kilogram of cricket protein requires approximately 2 square meters of land. Beef production requires roughly 200 square meters per kilogram of protein — about 100 times more.
Water use: Insects require 85-90 percent less water per kilogram of protein than beef.
Greenhouse gases: A study found that greenhouse gas emissions from cricket production were approximately 100 times lower per kilogram than those from beef, and significantly lower than pork and poultry.
Feed conversion: Crickets convert feed to body mass roughly 12 times more efficiently than cattle. They can also be raised on organic waste streams (food scraps, agricultural byproducts), reducing competition with human food supplies.
The FAO has endorsed edible insects as a meaningful contributor to future food security, particularly in contexts where conventional protein production is resource-constrained.
Current Market Reality
In the United States and Europe, insect protein is primarily available in:
- Cricket protein powder (for smoothies and baking)
- Cricket protein bars and snacks
- Pasta and crackers made with cricket flour
- Whole roasted crickets (flavored snacks)
Prices remain significantly higher than conventional protein sources due to small-scale production. As production scales, prices are expected to decrease.
Is It Worth Trying?
On pure nutritional grounds, cricket protein is a high-quality, complete protein source with good micronutrient density. It is not nutritionally superior to eggs, meat, or dairy — but it is competitive with them while carrying a dramatically lower environmental footprint.
View the OXO Good Grips 11-Pound Food Scale on Amazon
For people open to novel food ingredients, cricket protein powder blended into smoothies or protein bars is tasteless and texture-neutral. The psychological barrier is typically greater than any practical barrier.
For the majority of people in Western markets, insect protein is currently more of an environmentally motivated choice than a nutritionally necessary one. But as sustainability becomes an increasingly relevant lens for food choices, its case will only strengthen.
